Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Jul 1998 10:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Robert D. Keys" <bsdbob@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
To:        wwoods@cybcon.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 3.0 Snap----
Message-ID:  <199807271409.KAA22179@seedlab1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980726124859.wwoods@cybcon.com> from William Woods at "Jul 26, 98 12:48:59 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I dont know if this is the right list, but.............Would you all (those of
> you who are running it) consider 3.0 useable and stable to use in a work
> enviroment? I know it is beta but I just had to ask....

That is a good question.  I have been running the 523-SNAP since it came
out on my office boxes, and it seems stable as a rock, for my needs.
I don't do any exotic serving or crunching on them, but, do all my
office mail/networking/writing/etc on them and they are fine.

YMMV, of course, and I tried one of the later ones (6xx-SNAP) and it went
sideways, so there are ups and downs to 3.0 SNAPS.  The autoprobing was
off on the later one I tried.

I will port the 725-SNAP home tonight and try that, for comparisons.

So far, though, the 523-SNAP has been rock solid for me.  Kudos to the
3.0 crew.

Bob Keys


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199807271409.KAA22179>