Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 May 1996 07:34:46 -0400
From:      Gene Stark <gene@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu>
To:        Paul Danckaert <umbc.edu!pauld@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc:        security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD & firewalls
Message-ID:  <199605011134.HAA08293@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu>
In-Reply-To: Paul Danckaert's message of Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:02:16 -0400 (EDT)
References:  <4m5u6d$4r3@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Also, I'm just curious and haven't looked too much into it, but has 
>anybody used BSD to firewall people within a site?  For example, we are 
>looking at putting dorms on ethernet, but we are going to block various 
>protocols, ports, etc..  has anybody used a BSD solution to this sort of 
>problem?  Any recomendations on software?

Yes, I am using ipfw primarily to prevent egress from a student lab.
The purpose is to keep people from occupying seats in the lab while they
play MUDs or IRC or use X to outside, and to keep them from setting up lots
of quasi-commercial servers operating on machines within the lab.  The ipfw
code works more or less OK for this, but I found it a bit difficult to create
the filters I wanted.

Mostly, what I am doing is blocking TCP between endpoints inside and outside
the lab, both ports of which are >= 1024.  The main disadvantage of this
seems to be that "passive FTP", or whatever it is that happens sometimes
when you follow an ftp: link from an HTTP server and get a high numbered port,
is blocked.
							- Gene Stark



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605011134.HAA08293>