Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:29:24 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any objections/comments on axing out old ATA stack? Message-ID: <969B2F75-EBBF-40F3-B805-323E1BFAD7F9@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr%2Bp3kt%2Btr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com> References: <51536306.5030907@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-Vmon-8FaLa-=F=Z3dL85FPoRr%2Bp3kt%2Btr1fo7AkOV9hhyCA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:43 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > My main concern with the new stuff is that it requires CAM and that's > reasonably big compared to the standalone ATA code. >=20 =46rom a code execution standpoint? No, it's not. > It'd be nice if we could slim down the CAM stack a bit first; it makes > embedding it on the smaller devices really freaking painful. >=20 =46rom a code segment size standpoint, there's definitely some stuff = that should be made modular and optional. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?969B2F75-EBBF-40F3-B805-323E1BFAD7F9>