Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 7 Sep 1995 10:34:39 -0400
From:      "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        peter@osix.com.au
Cc:        Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Do we *really* need logger(1)? 
Message-ID:  <9509071434.AA22441@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199509071137.LAA09858@thumper.osix.com.au>
References:  <199509071137.LAA09858@thumper.osix.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 7 Sep 1995 11:51:30 +0000, "Peter May" <peter@osix.osix.oz.au> said:

> However, all of these changes are significant, and it means making 
> syslog somewhat non-standard. I guess that could be important as 
> well.

Actually, I have a number of times contemplated writing a
syslog-replacement that would have a better configuration file and
allow for automatic log rotation.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance.
Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence.  We like people
MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish.  - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9509071434.AA22441>