Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 May 2013 17:10:33 -0400
From:      "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To:        "Lev Serebryakov" <lev@freebsd.org>, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [rft] please test -HEAD ath; lots of TX changes
Message-ID:  <51a3cbd0.2a98320a.4098.28c1@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <711055633.20130528010212@serebryakov.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sweet. I think the problem getting n rates here are likely due to buffer st=
arvation when queuing the addba request or response frames.

So I still have to properly fix that. But it'll happen.

Cool, keep testing!


Adrian



Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&amp;T
On May 27, 2013 5:02 PM, Lev Serebryakov &lt;lev@freebsd.org&gt; wrote:=20

Hello, Adrian.

You wrote 27 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., 11:29:29:



AC&gt; Would you mind re-testing with what's now in -HEAD?

 Ok, now I can not "force" connection NOT TO PICK UP n-rates (without

disabling N on sever or client).

 Performance is better, than usual (150-180Mbit/s UDP), and SOMETIMES

here are such messages:



May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_suspend: tid=3D0, bar_=
wait=3D0, bar_tx=3D0, called

May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx_ready: c4:85:08:3f:=
9e:c2: TID=3D0, bar ready

May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 TID=3D0, called

May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 TID=3D0, new BAW left edge=3D186

May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_bar_response: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 called; txa_tid=3D0, atid-&gt;tid=3D0, status=3D0, attempts=3D1

May 28 00:40:51 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_unsuspend: c4:85:08:3f=
:9e:c2: TID=3D0, called

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_suspend: tid=3D0, bar_=
wait=3D0, bar_tx=3D0, called

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx_ready: c4:85:08:3f:=
9e:c2: TID=3D0, bar ready

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 TID=3D0, called

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_tx: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 TID=3D0, new BAW left edge=3D3517

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_bar_response: c4:85:08:3f:9e:c2:=
 called; txa_tid=3D0, atid-&gt;tid=3D0, status=3D0, attempts=3D1

May 28 00:40:52 gateway kernel: ath0: ath_tx_tid_bar_unsuspend: c4:85:08:3f=
:9e:c2: TID=3D0, called



 Which correlates with dropping of bandwidth to 90Mbit/s for one

second. But no re-association problems, no "20-30Mbit/s" problem. And

I've tried to power-cycle client and AP, it still pick up N rates from

first packet now!



  When I disable N on client, it shows stable 30Mbit/s (no 54m though

:)), but still no de/re-association problems for 600 seconds.



  But, I stress this out: there was NO way to get non-N rates when N

 was enabled on both ends, there was NO auth/association problems for

 several 600-seconds runs. And, yes, in my previous experiments,

 auth/association problems were only in situation when two N-enabled

 parties used non-N rates.



--=20

// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov &lt;lev@FreeBSD.org&gt;







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51a3cbd0.2a98320a.4098.28c1>