Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 10:50:48 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@iijlab.net> To: "Open Systems Inc." <opsys@open-systems.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <27221.912736248@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: opsys's message of Wed, 02 Dec 1998 18:33:01 CST. <Pine.BSF.3.96.981202182823.602B-100000@pinkfloyd.open-systems.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I think the point thats been made about WHO is going to maintain this code >should as well be taken into consideration. >KAME promises to maintain it upto and until the project ends in 2000. >Then what? Are any KAME folks commiters? If so are those committers >willing to say they will maintain the code after 2K? Notes about the above: "Project ends in 2K" is a initial plan (the project is started as 2-year project. Core workers are really like the KAME project's goals and environment, and would like to continue doing this work. It depends on: - success/failure of newer protocols such as IPv6/IPsec. - how people who write paychecks to core workers thinks. I believe the former item is okay:-) and the latter item should be solved in 1999. Anyway, even if the project ends, I certainly will maintain KAME tree (KAME was maintained in my home last year) and I'm a FreeBSD committer. itojun@itojun.org jun-ichiro itoh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27221.912736248>