Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:16:00 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Paul Ambrose <ambrosehua@gmail.com> Cc: Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <4ED583D0.6030403@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAMwoQQ6db_22AAxkWbaoe8rGaqw8K-LiKrATgXLnnjT7ZsGQNA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADe0-4=DwzFj1NbJTeq3p92YGF_5yjhc-Yajn-hHNB_aca1k2g@mail.gmail.com> <20111129213413.GB14357@stack.nl> <4ED551B5.8090809@gmail.com> <CAMwoQQ6db_22AAxkWbaoe8rGaqw8K-LiKrATgXLnnjT7ZsGQNA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What does dtrace have to do with profiled libs? On 11/29/2011 17:14, Paul Ambrose wrote: > I think dtrace for freebsd userland is close to complete( after > r227290, at least no more kernel panic). but is not suitable for a > daily use now. > > 在 2011年11月30日 上午5:42，Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com> 写道： >> I assume every who responded so far doesn't use dtrace? -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED583D0.6030403>