Date: Mon, 3 Jul 1995 11:07:35 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@render.com> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.atinc.com> Cc: Ollivier Robert <roberto@blaise.ibp.fr>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMC ethernet codes Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950703110539.4539F-100000@minnow.render.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9507020951.B25080-0100000@kryten.atinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Jul 1995, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 1995, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > > > can someone verify that 00:c0:4f:de:b3:a9 belongs to SMC? > > > > > > I though all SMC addresses (or at least the ones I have seen) > > > start 00:00:c0, maybe the used this block up :).) > > > > There is no trace of 00:c0:* in rfc-1700... > > > > 0080C2 IEEE 802.1 Committee > > 0080D3 Shiva > > 00AA00 Intel > > 00DD00 Ungermann-Bass > > thanks for your responses. > > i will contact SMC and see what they have to say. hopefully it > is a new address space allocation.....else i have to figure whats wrong > with the code and my understanding of the data sheet. ;( I have 11 SMC 8216 cards here, all with addresses starting with 00:00:c0. SMC seem to be using this prefix consistently for new cards. -- Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 251 4411 FAX: +44 171 251 0939
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.950703110539.4539F-100000>