Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:31:50 +0200 From: Robert Klein <RoKlein@roklein.de> To: Sandro Tolaini <sandro@focuseek.com>, Release Engineers <re@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, vendors@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 4.6.1 Message-ID: <200208011031.50355.RoKlein@roklein.de> In-Reply-To: <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com> References: <XFMail.20020731162333.re@FreeBSD.org> <200208011012.35023.sandro@focuseek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Risking to put my foot into my mouth: > Just a question about ports: I saw that the ports tree has the matching tag > for 4.6.1 release at the same revisions of 4.6 (that is, ports bundled with > 4.6.1 release CDs will be the same packaged with 4.6). I think that ports > bundled with 4.6.2 should be more recent. As far as I know, the Release Candidates used the ports for 4.6 (after all, they're release _candidates_). I remember having read somewhere (qa-freebsd list?), a package built of the current ports was being scheduled --- at a time, when 4.6.1 still was scheduled. Especially in the light, of some ports being statically linked against now fixed libraries etc. I think you can trust re@ to meet the decision you desire. Regards, Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208011031.50355.RoKlein>