Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:39:59 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Christian Baer <christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines Message-ID: <86przndoe8.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <feilee$2m3t$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> (Christian Baer's message of "Wed\, 10 Oct 2007 15\:52\:14 %2B0200 \(CEST\)") References: <feilee$2m3t$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christian Baer <christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de> writes: > If someone sees the result of RELENG_6 is called STABLE, he or she will > problably think, this is the line where bug fixes are added, security > problems fixed and the whole thing is meant for production systems. While > the first two things may be true, I would not suggest RELENG_6 for > production systems. Normally the -STABLE line works fine. But I *have* > times in the past where a driver was changes and suddenly the system > *didn't* work after a reboot or showed strange behaviour. YMMV. I run both CURRENT and STABLE on production systems. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86przndoe8.fsf>