Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:02:02 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
To:        Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
Cc:        Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca>, "Brandon J. Wandersee" <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com>,  FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: suspend/resume regression
Message-ID:  <CAJ-Vmomo7JSUs5z=ob_7K6MSbhTA1Uq9bTVMM0ssnfCnoaP1=Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1smQ5uhert2BngMFtZCdrMdcOM6tXW7oYQTZvu1S4saJw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <86oak289hv.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <CAJ-Vmo=onHpgQzxqk1_AsBNXvDNGqcMjBDf8DCff7Zt39Pipqg@mail.gmail.com> <86616894vk.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <CAN6yY1tuv6XO05HPXTVdoQGHFz-0Bod0Lvj4h5PRqEyyVy61Xg@mail.gmail.com> <86oak0bkky.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <CAN6yY1ud1-0MXnZXSo74oVxOhMU4%2Bc3KY9-6LmGXQ2Aq6-q6TQ@mail.gmail.com> <867fqo6sbh.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <CAN6yY1sGmjv6NtKQWHRkngVJMew0exy2D_VaqvDYSr80TwxPMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sPPkCGen7ZGzSQZNGc7NrzXPRuKi4sQNyUZbwQpkrfZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sF4f8CtnGO8TzwNDDD432bOaHS-gY5_f3eaY5nGMs9Ow@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokMH%2BWoi9HmuK_U003XWWvUS0qCZwUO7euNvLz7v4ei-w@mail.gmail.com> <86zj3j68e7.fsf@gly.ftfl.ca> <CAN6yY1smQ5uhert2BngMFtZCdrMdcOM6tXW7oYQTZvu1S4saJw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for digging into this!

(two laptops are now running -head from today, all iswell. I'll update
the t400 tomorrow.)


-a


On 28 June 2015 at 16:54, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone <jrm@ftfl.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> writes:
>> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at
>> > suspend/resume.
>>
>> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
>>
>> > I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
>> > reference laptop.
>>
>> You might ping Allan Jude.  If I'm not mistaken he had at least two
>> X220s at BSDCan.  Maybe he'd be willing to part with one.
>
>
> I have now merged all of the parts of 284034 except for 281874 and resumes
> work fine. As i suspected, something in that rather large commit is the
> problem and it is probably something that depends on some other change in
> HEAD as Adrian has reported that it works fine in HEAD.
>
> I'll have to admit that have no idea how to approach figuring this out. I'm
> not sure how I can even revert a part of the commit to get 10.2-PRERELEASE
> working for me. I really wish that a commit as large as this one had been
> MFCed separately. :-(  So far there has been only a single commit to pci and
> none to pccbb since 284034, so I guess I'll build stable with the files
> modified in 281874 manually reverted and see how that goes.
> --
> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
> E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
> .



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmomo7JSUs5z=ob_7K6MSbhTA1Uq9bTVMM0ssnfCnoaP1=Q>