Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:08:42 +0300 From: dima <_pppp@mail.ru> To: Marc G.Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High ping latency using two ethernet under FreeBSD 4.11 ... Message-ID: <E1DB76Y-0005xM-00._pppp-mail-ru@f19.mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050315011200.G92893@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Testing my network, I just noticed the following: > > --- 200.46.204.1 ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 399.664/407.119/420.315/8.267 ms > > --- 200.46.208.1 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 373.045/409.266/453.402/33.280 ms > > 400ms to my default router seems a wee bit high ... > > I'm suspecting that it has to do with: > > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune last message repeated 10 times > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune /kernel: arp: 200.46.204.1 is on em0 but got reply from 00:0b:bf:42:a8:06 on em1 > Mar 15 01:13:28 neptune /kernel: arp: 200.46.208.1 is on em1 but got reply from 00:0b:bf:42:a8:06 on em0 > > In order to provide network redundancy, and simplify our scripting, with > have one network bound to one ethernet port, and the other network bound > to the second one on the same machine ... > > I'm plugging everything into a Cisco 2924 ... is there some way, either on > the FreeBSD side, or Cisco, of 'cleaning this up'? Try ng_fec. It works ok with 2950, not sure about 2924 though. > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1DB76Y-0005xM-00._pppp-mail-ru>