Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:11:33 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng abilities (was: pkgng vs. portupgrade reporting ports outdated) Message-ID: <20140405131133.67a5e15e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <533FEF44.10302@rcn.com> References: <533FEF44.10302@rcn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 07:55:48 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: > Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > pkg(8) does a damn sight more than the old pkg_tools. > > Granted, though much of it I currently have little use > for. :-) > > >> "pkgng" can do almost everything the old system can, and does it > >> better.> > > > > s/almost// > > OK, Obi-wan - what's the replacement for: > > a) "portsclean" with the C, D (single and double), and L > options? (Use no more than two commands.) > b) "pkg_sort" ? > > With these, I will cheerfully delete portupgrade. portupgrade isn't part of "the old pkg_tools"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140405131133.67a5e15e>