Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:43:23 +1030 From: Andrew D <andrewd@webzone.net.au> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: always-interactive ports Message-ID: <492A9A63.4020505@webzone.net.au> In-Reply-To: <492A964B.1060103@icyb.net.ua> References: <492A964B.1060103@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon wrote: > I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports > that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity > options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license > acceptance. > You will probably find this is for legal reasons. > If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. > > One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch. > Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492A9A63.4020505>