Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:59:46 -0700
From:      John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
To:        John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current
Message-ID:  <20140612165946.GT31367@funkthat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140522090504.GA22488@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
References:  <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com> <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <95AD97BA-AA48-4BBF-845C-D0CB585ACAA3@bsdimp.com> <20140522090504.GA22488@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Hay wrote this message on Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:05 +0200:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:01:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > 
> > On May 21, 2014, at 1:28 PM, John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > >> isn't eabi on the xscale still broken?
> > > 
> > > It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than that. :-(
> > > By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get an AVILA kernel
> > > built that boots with src from head at around mid December. Latest 10
> > > and head just give no output, with or without WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined.
> > 
> > Does the same thing happen with make.conf instead of src.conf?
> 
> Yes, I have tried both 10 and head with WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes and no
> output after go in redboot. My compile lines look like this:
> 
> make TARGET_ARCH=armeb TARGET_CPUTYPE=xscale toolchain
> make TARGET=arm TARGET_ARCH=armeb buildkernel KERNCONF=AVILA DESTDIR=/arm/
> 
> And then in redboot "load -b 0x200000 kernel" to load it with tftp. And
> then "go".
> 
> The "no output" happened somewhere between mid December and beginning
> of Feb. I determined that before getting side tracked. I'll see in the
> next day or two if I can narrow that down.

That sounds like the gcc bug that was fixed...

> If someone have patches so that WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes is not needed
> anymore, I'll test that too.

We are getting close to having EABI working on AVILA...  alc has
tracked down a couple issues that was causing kernel panics..

Look for an email shortly on a remaining issue, which I believe is
w/ rtld...

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140612165946.GT31367>