Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:58:41 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd file in /lost+found after softupdate inconsistency in fsck Message-ID: <20080305185841.GU68971@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20080305213442.A36748@plexi.pun-pun.prv> References: <20080305213442.A36748@plexi.pun-pun.prv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--kadn00tgSopKmJ1H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:43:15PM +0900, Tod McQuillin wrote: >/home/lost+found# ls -lksh >total 24432 >24432 -r-------- 1 root operator 40G Mar 5 20:12 #0000005 > >It is 40G in size but only occupies 24432k on disk, so it is a sparse file= =2E=20 The file permissions and sparseness matches a snapshot. If your FS is 40GB then it is a snapshot. >/home/lost+found# rm \#0000005 >override r-------- root/operator snapshot for #0000005? n The file itself is not writable so rm prompts. This is normal. >Is there a magic "shapshot" flag on the file? Have I somehow damaged my= =20 >ufs2+softupdates filesystem by losing its inode #5 containing snapshot=20 >data? No and no. You can have multiple snapshots in a filesystem. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --kadn00tgSopKmJ1H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHzu1h/opHv/APuIcRArV4AJ4oeQpRnpzP4+y+gB2tvuSBlPv30wCfUE37 j0DsbemOLagl/uW+4kmk7rM= =m46V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kadn00tgSopKmJ1H--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080305185841.GU68971>