Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:28:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Michael Powell <nightrecon@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204280927050.9361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <jnb4p4$jgd$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <loom.20120425T142751-217@post.gmane.org> <2FCC4ECF-DAC2-4701-B392-B0415528A4C7@mac.com> <loom.20120425T202502-789@post.gmane.org> <loom.20120426T065807-118@post.gmane.org> <CA%2BtpaK2JQ3ZkmXZK4v_j4nwssBrz9Hj69kV5=tkmyUxaHGaksg@mail.gmail.com> <jnb4p4$jgd$1@dough.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If you really are having a problem with FreeBSD you are going to have to do > a lot better than this in terms of providing some data points which define > the problem. I am in agreement with Adam here: either you can work the > problem or you can troll. I don't see any indication yet of any real problem > analysis, only a wild mix of stuff non-related to FreeBSD sprinkled with some > magic 'memory management' dust. > The fact that FreeBSD DOES NOT page excessively on the same workload relative to other OS (linux, netbsd) is one of most important thing i decided to use it. If his system is heavily paging then simply he have too large working set.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1204280927050.9361>