Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:07:12 +0930 (CST)
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility
Message-ID:  <XFMail.000426170712.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0004260929430.97160-100000@mx.webgiro.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 26-Apr-00 Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>  Yes, that's what I'm doing now - so far the best method. But still
>  requires having N+1 boxes (which is not a concern for me, but for someone
>  having e.g. 2 boxes in production this represents 1/3 increment), plus
>  topology allowing for using NFS mounts.

True, depending on your setup you can do it ON your production machine :)

Or on your workstation etc..

---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000426170712.doconnor>