Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:29:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vice OS X memory management Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1204280928440.9361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120426190304.0ec3330f@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <loom.20120425T142751-217@post.gmane.org> <2FCC4ECF-DAC2-4701-B392-B0415528A4C7@mac.com> <loom.20120425T202502-789@post.gmane.org> <loom.20120426T065807-118@post.gmane.org> <CA%2BtpaK2JQ3ZkmXZK4v_j4nwssBrz9Hj69kV5=tkmyUxaHGaksg@mail.gmail.com> <loom.20120426T095813-923@post.gmane.org> <20120426190304.0ec3330f@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> is relatively new. My guess is that if there is a problem it's ZFS > specific. If it were a more general problem I think we'd see a lot more > complaints, whereas ZFS already has a reputation for needing lots of > memory. you may precisely set up a limits of memory that ZFS would use at most. or just don't use it which i do.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1204280928440.9361>