Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 03:14:10 +0100 From: Simon Barner <barner@in.tum.de> To: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: shells/bash-completion requires textproc/gsed Message-ID: <20040219021410.GI74292@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> In-Reply-To: <20040218161524.GD10213@pc61.anyware> References: <200402180928.i1I9Sjal034486@oxyd.caraldi.com> <878yj0l6tp.fsf@strauser.com> <20040218161524.GD10213@pc61.anyware>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > Most users won't care about that WITH_GSED switch, and most > completions just won't work. What about inverted logic: WITHOUT_GSED? Simon --l+goss899txtYvYf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFANBvxCkn+/eutqCoRAmuXAJ9UGv9we7+0ZyhSy2C7NzQk3bK2zgCeMqX9 BIi0qBAKfvXSb25WwkhZMQg= =ngrj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l+goss899txtYvYf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219021410.GI74292>