Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:36:58 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Ulf Schleth <ulf@echtzeit.de>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nfs Message-ID: <19980527093658.U24133@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <356ABEFC.D8D1DFC7@echtzeit.de>; from Ulf Schleth on Tue, May 26, 1998 at 03:09:16PM %2B0200 References: <356ABEFC.D8D1DFC7@echtzeit.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 May 1998 at 15:09:16 +0200, Ulf Schleth wrote: > hi, > > one little questions: does freebsd supports nfs3, Yes. It's standard. > so that filelocks over nfs will work? Some people say yes. Here's a copy of a message that went through the -chat list a couple of days ago: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 14:41:58 -0500 (CDT) > From: tip <tip@enteract.com> > To: dc-stuff@dis.org > Subject: freebsd vs linux (nfs) > > >from unix review's "performance computing" magazine, june 1998, > pages 21-28, > > comparisons are on nt products vs various flavors of unix. > > for simplicity's sake, linux, bsdi, and freebsd are only mentioned here > for comparison of bsd vs linux: > > NFS PROTOCOL SUPPORT > -------------------- > nfs v.2 nfs v.3 webnfs > udp tcp udp tcp > bsdi x x x x > freebsd x x x x x > linux x > > > SUPPORT FOR ANCILLARY NFS PROTOCOLS > ----------------------------------- > RPC PORTMAPPER MOUNT PROTOCOL NETWORK LOCK MGR STATUS > Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP Over UDP Over TCP UDP TCP > v2 v3 v4 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v2 v3 v4 v1 v1 > bsdi x x x x x x > freebsd x x x x x x x x x x x > linux x x x x The general reaction was that you shouldn't rely on it too much. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980527093658.U24133>