Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:56:56 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rcNG-fy sysutils/daemontools Message-ID: <20040624215656.GC2918@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040624151543.5cadaf83.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20040620070446.21a599c7.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20040622183550.GI46866@hal9000.halplant.com> <20040624151543.5cadaf83.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# nork@FreeBSD.org / 2004-06-24 15:15:43 +0900:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:35:50 -0400
> Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@halplant.com> wrote:
> > Norikatsu,
> > If daemontools is getting a patch, I wonder if my pet peeve could get
> > fixed, too:
> > ----8<----
> > PATH=$PREFIX/sbin:$PREFIX/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:$PATH /bin/csh -cf "$SVSCAN $SVDIR |& $READPROCTITLE service errors: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ &" > /dev/null
> > ----8<----
> > Even ignoring the overall ugliness of this line, the arbitrary and
> > unnecessary /bin/csh dependency prevents the use of NO_TCSH=true to make
> > systems good and pure and free from harm.
>
> Hum... I read some daemontools's documents. According to
> these, I considerd that csh was reqired. Don't you think it?
Do you have a URL?
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040624215656.GC2918>