Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 12:03:42 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCMGY+ZU5JPy4bKEI=?=) <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, guido@gvr.org, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, eivind@yes.no, itojun@iijlab.net Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <19981204120342M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Dec 1998 11:04:11 %2B0900" <27368.912737051@coconut.itojun.org> References: <27368.912737051@coconut.itojun.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >It's only available for 2.2.7, and therefor Jordan pointed out, > >that this is a real disadvantage for 3.0, which is the future... > We are doing KAME on 3.0. Shin (cc'ed) has more to say about this. > Basically, the last item left is TCP integration to IPv6. There > has been big changes in netinet tree between 2.2.x to 3.0 so we > have to modify from scratch. Also, we are going to share PCB lists of IPv6 and IPv4 in KAME for 3.0. (they are separated in KAME 2.2.x) Followings are finished items in my KAME for 3.0 work. -IPSEC -basic IPv6 communication (including address auto configuration) -system tools (ifconfig, route, netstat, etc) -RAW socket over IPv6 socket (and user-land applications using it) -UDP socket over IPv6 socket (and some user-land applications using it) Now I am working on TCP merging. Transport layers are not merged in KAME for 2.2.x, so it takes time, but I think I can finish it in 2 weeks optimisticly, and in this year at longest. Yoshinobu Inoue shin@kame.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981204120342M.shin>