Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:12:13 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Doug" <Doug@gorean.org>, "Terry Lambert" <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: <scrappy@hub.org>, <beyssac@enst.fr>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Message-ID: <000001bece24$65a5c5e0$021d85d1@youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907140904580.25793-100000@dt054n86.san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I can give you a list of things from my experience (not a > webmaster.com employee). Threads, SMP, NFS, and purify. I can't think of > anything NT does better than any unix though. :) Large RAID arrays. 4-way SMP. Applications requiring large numbers of threads. Log-based system. There's nothing I know of in any UNIX that comes close to NT's completion ports for efficient network I/O. I won't bother listing NT's problems -- we all know them. But it doesn't do us any good to ignore its strengths. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000001bece24$65a5c5e0$021d85d1>