Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:20:03 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: Benjamin Walkenhorst <krylon@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org performance? Message-ID: <20040920162003.1583186a@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> References: <20040918165741.20d10137.krylon@gmx.net> <200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org> <20040918183953.0666ea91.krylon@gmx.net> <b2807d040409200710568b4976@mail.gmail.com> <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:56:52 +0200 Benjamin Walkenhorst <krylon@gmx.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:40:30 +0530 > Subhro <subhro.kar@gmail.com> wrote: > > > cat /etc/make.conf > > ------------------------ > PERL_VER=5.8.2 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.2 > PERL_ARCH=mach > NOPERL=yo > NO_PERL=yo > NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo > > CPUTYPE=athlon-mp > > CFLAGS+= -O2 -pipe > X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg > ------------------------ > > But like I said, I think I chose the wrong words - > X.org does not perform poorly, it's just that it sometimes will > use lots of CPU, and I am under the impression it does even more so > than XFree did. > Or is it just my perception kidding me? Try reworking a lot of thinks with out the -O2 flag. I've seen massive breakage caused by them, with little or no noticeable speed gain.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920162003.1583186a>