Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jan 2015 08:09:21 -0500
From:      "O'Connor, Daniel" <Daniel.O'Connor@emc.com>
To:        Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
Cc:        "O'Connor, Daniel" <Daniel.O'Connor@emc.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: if_pflow from OpenBSD
Message-ID:  <3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1@emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150109110207.45e280dd@mr185083>
References:  <45056363-1E83-4318-B870-7F673993166B@emc.com> <20150108101744.2c2a9eae@mr185083> <9085F2E7-5429-4C16-86DB-7C3F04C993DC@emc.com> <20150109110207.45e280dd@mr185083>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 9 Jan 2015, at 20:32, Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> wrote=
:
> pflow(4) has the drawback to handle netflow only at the end of the
> session.

Hmm, really? I looked at the code and it does have timeouts to emit things,=
 but perhaps I am misreading it.

Regards,
	Daniel O=92Connor

Senior Software Engineer
Isilon Platforms Team






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E1BDE12-9A82-4849-AC52-A155C613C1A1>