Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:42:27 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/64150: [PATCH] ls(1) coredumps when started via execve(2) with no argv. Message-ID: <20040312164227.GC8990@lum.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <20040312154600.GC2235@ip.net.ua> References: <200403120922.i2C9M0jC002510@stud326.idi.ntnu.no> <20040312104914.GA52099@ip.net.ua> <20040312105730.GA99925@stud326.idi.ntnu.no> <20040312110657.GB52099@ip.net.ua> <20040312111526.GA14260@stack.nl> <20040312125820.GA8574@lum.celabo.org> <20040312154600.GC2235@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 05:46:00PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > As Garrett already pointed out in the PR log, have you considered this? > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/execve.html#tag_03_130_08 This doesn't seem to contradict anything we've discussed so far, does it? > I'm happy with changing our behavior to Strictly Conforming for the > goods of security, and you? Isn't that a bonus if it also makes us `Strictly Conforming'? :-) Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040312164227.GC8990>