Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:53:28 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: database tables for VuXML Message-ID: <412BAAC8.10821.1F94E6D@localhost> In-Reply-To: <EA56FB26-F61D-11D8-91E7-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <412B7D29.31547.1472F80@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Aug 2004 at 0:35, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > > FreshPorts stores PORTVERSION and PORTREVISION as separate text > > fields. I take it that the ranges equations should compare only > > PORTVERSION and ignore PORTREVISION. > > Please not. pkg_version -t is the reference here, when you get different > results something is wrong I'm confused. FreshPorts obtains information primarily via "make - V". pkg_version works on installed ports only. FreshPorts is not gong to install a port to find out what version we have. Are we talking about the same thing? > (and ignoring PORTREVISION will get you different results). > Also keep in mind that PORTEPOCH is an essential component. That's news to me. Thanks. I see it is used to create PKGNAME. Looking at range data of vuxml, I see now that PORTEPOCH is used. OK. Thanks for the heads up. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412BAAC8.10821.1F94E6D>