Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 23:26:27 -0500 From: stan <stanb@panix.com> To: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problems (linux emulation?) building Openoffice 1.1 Message-ID: <20040211042627.GA4661@teddy.fas.com> In-Reply-To: <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net> References: <20040210180238.GA16205@teddy.fas.com> <40291E81.6010803@math.missouri.edu> <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> <20040210222951.GB27223@teddy.fas.com> <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:07:05PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > > BTW, do you [know] where teh default "jail" for linux_base is? > > Those messages have been causing a lot of questions. :( Would there be an > objection if I just removed them? Anders? > > FreeBSD's jail(8) is sort of an enhanced chroot environment that has an IP > address associated with it. > > If you aren't using it already, the linux_base port won't set it up. In > that case, you can just press enter when that message appears. If you are > using jails, then you (or your sysadmin) ought to know the paths to them. > There's no default path; it can be different for every site. Ah, I understood what a jail was. I just thought that linux_base now used one by default. Might I sugest you simply change the message to say "if you are using jails... the default is not to, if thta is your case, simply press return here" Just my $0.2 worth. So, taht's not what is causing my Openoffcie build problem then, right? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040211042627.GA4661>