Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:14:08 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/ibus-chewing distinfo Message-ID: <20101213201407.GC61140@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <4D06639E.1080405@p6m7g8.com> References: <201012130437.oBD4bHEq008860@repoman.freebsd.org> <20101213164130.GA48218@atarininja.org> <4D06639E.1080405@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2010-Dec-13 18:19:10 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> = wrote: >On 12/13/10 16:41, Wesley Shields wrote: >> I thought it was a good idea to state what changed when a distfile was >> re-rolled without a version bump. >Well it is, but they re-rolled inbetween my tb test, commit and QAT >processing it. I can go digg it up but I was just trying to fix the QAT >nag mail at the time. Given that we've very recently had an instance where the ProFTPD backdoor was initially missed because the committer didn't follow the correct process, I am amazed that anyone would use that excuse. --=20 Peter Jeremy --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0Gfo8ACgkQ/opHv/APuIfK/QCgnf/qz0m0DT9p2PnEFJFlRTJg A0gAoKDsBxPu7j7sYefk5dMP8+VQJBf/ =Si++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101213201407.GC61140>