Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 12:10:26 +0100 From: Hans Zuidam <zuidam14@zonnet.nl> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: FrameMaker for Linux port questions Message-ID: <38D9FBA1.A98BC071@zonnet.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm finishing a port for the FrameMaker for Linux beta from Adobe. Before submitting it I have a few questions which someone more knowledgeable may answer: o There are four distribution file: FrameMaker proper, the help files, on-line manuals and dictionaries. Currently I have a single port which installs all of them at once, but would it be "better" to have four different ports? o If I set RESTRICTED in the port Makefile, is that sufficient to avoid the distribution files from showing up at FreeBSD.org and on future CDs? o During package removal pkg_delete complains about not being able to remove (private) shared libraries. It complains about such files as libpgm.so.1 in the PLIST I have libpgm.so.1.0. My current "sollution" is to use an @unexec. o Also during package removal some symbolic links to directories are frowned upon by pkg_delete. o My current "build"/installation method is to unpack the files in the work directory, fix a few permissions and patch a script and then move (mv) it to the installation directory. Is that the "correct" approach? Thanks in advance, Hans -- H. Zuidam e-mail <h.zuidam@computer.org> Kruidenhof 18 tel. +31 40 2481546 5632 MD Eindhoven The Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38D9FBA1.A98BC071>