Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:21:09 -0600
From:      Andrew Falanga <af300wsm@gmail.com>
To:        John Gage <grepkeen@gmail.com>
Cc:        Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: What flash players should be used from ports?
Message-ID:  <340a29540904141521k9e6d88bh224d01c5b976d01c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ed86e0a0904141441o23c317ffr382347cdaf655d54@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <340a29540904141347o260eddday3e6f7a0785166060@mail.gmail.com> <8ed86e0a0904141441o23c317ffr382347cdaf655d54@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, John Gage <grepkeen@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Falanga <af300wsm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to finally get a flashplayer installed for use with Firefox.
>  Which
> > one should I use from the ports system?  I found this one that looks
> > promising:
> >
> > /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla
> >
> > Is the recommended one, or should I choose another?
> >
> > Andy
>
> I'd like to give you a detailed, step-by-step procedure; but first can
> you list your:
>
> 1. CPU architecture (e.g. i386, amd64, etc.)
> 2. Firefox version branch (e.g. /usr/ports/www/firefox == firefox 2.*
> branch, /usr/ports/www/firefox3 == firefox 3.* branch)
>

Currently running i386.  I'm using firefox 3.0.4 (need to upgrade, wow
didn't realize that).


-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?340a29540904141521k9e6d88bh224d01c5b976d01c>