Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:28:33 -0500
From:      Jerry <gesbbb@yahoo.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Force use of 'gpg2'
Message-ID:  <20090203142833.65a72eae@scorpio>
In-Reply-To: <b79ecaef0902031103w43558a1ej5b2c22c7550f64d9@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20090203122406.1732b3f0@scorpio> <b79ecaef0902031103w43558a1ej5b2c22c7550f64d9@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
--Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:03:01 +0000
Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>Try putting the link in somewhere that gets searched before
>/usr/local/bin, like /bin or (better) /usr/bin. Then try rehash &&
>which gpg

I am using 'bash' so I don't think 'rehash' is going to do anything,
although I could be mistaken. However, I don't see how that would stop
a port from installing 'gpg' rather than 'gpg2'. I don't need both
versions installed and would rather just keep the newer 'gpg2' one.

--=20
Jerry
gesbbb@yahoo.com

One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to
do and always a clever thing to say.

	Will Durant

--Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmImusACgkQBvaKIJWWCO1wHQCfaBkgxkrB9bDJRgSMFpwkMRv4
RWoAninBn4G+2IK0aw++p5nxL8lR1rer
=0b9e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/71UjyCNI2pOZrjTp2J+2Ja3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090203142833.65a72eae>