Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      18 Apr 2002 20:39:45 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: pam_unix and missing function warnings
Message-ID:  <xzpzo0097gu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <xzp4ri8amnd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References:  <20020418135935.K42854-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <xzp4ri8amnd.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
> "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> writes:
> > If not pam_unix, what module is responsible for updating utmp?
> pam_lastlog(8) (though there seems to be a problem with sshd)

Yep, the problem seems to be that sshd calls pam_open_session(3) too
early.  I'm looking into it right now.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzo0097gu.fsf>