Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:54:38 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jwd@unx.sas.com, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Subject: Re: inetd: realloc/free bug Message-ID: <XFMail.981211175438.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199812110717.XAA35358@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11-Dec-98 Matthew Dillon wrote: > I definitely think it's a mistake to change select()'s timeout operation, > too many programs pre-set the timeval and assume it will not be changed > on multiple calls to select(). If we were to implement a returned-time it > would have to be with a new system call. Which would be useful.. I would like to have this functionality when I write code :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.981211175438.doconnor>