Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:46:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4A4BD926.2090002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org> <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Project tradition dictates that if a maintainer submits a change there
is no need to add "Approved by: maintainer" in the cvs log. Even
though it's just one line, less repo bloat is a good thing. :)
If you were concerned that the final version submitted by the
maintainer is different than that in the PR, noting _that_ fact in the
commit log would probably be useful.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A4BD926.2090002>