Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Jan 1996 10:47:26 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com (Marty Leisner)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, d_burr@ix.netcom.com, web@merit.edu, questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: which vi is used in FreeBSD 2.1 ??
Message-ID:  <199601041747.KAA18045@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9601041739.AA13813@gnu.mc.xerox.com> from "Marty Leisner" at Jan 4, 96 09:39:04 am

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> My understanding is the Bill Joy vi doesn't even catch SIGWINCH...
> 
> Would you prefer a vi (like Sun's) which doesn't resize in an xterm?

I think the "SIGnal WINdow CHange" is actually Sun-specific.

No, I wouldn't prefer that.

But typing "^Z" and "fg\r" shouldn't break my cursor keys on a VT100,
the standard by which all other terminals are judged.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601041747.KAA18045>