Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:23:28 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org> <42924949.1070902@incubus.de> <200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net> <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de> <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > But are any IRQs shared? Hmm... atapci1 is shared with fxp0 on irq 20.. does fxp0 also require the giant lock? mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42938D40.1050502>