Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:41:47 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What changed? (gem command missing in 1.9) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgngBr3q-2Pzy6mG9UP0LRkxwJrKLk76gF8eo7%2Bwbo6Hew@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAGDxMR66_1GexKFbN2bu9%2B-T%2BrxJ-UHW5WsfLJQvqMG7M=m66A@mail.gmail.com> <20111111143115.5bf5d195.stas@FreeBSD.org> <CAGDxMR4P3TiJkTkk4o=gTW5-Hj6my2bsgc9j6aX=EwanPJ0MNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGDxMR51-yk0fUOdBUBmEC1ntXS2eA-QEpkS5Ymtp95jf0u7mw@mail.gmail.com> <20111111181823.089d72be.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4EBDDABE.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20111111183724.5712e1e2.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> wrote: > I believe it might do. =C2=A0I'm not sure though you can run depend on so= mething > that build depends on you, so it needs testing. Even if it "works" I'd like to see if we could find an alternate solution. These sort of changes seem like they are designed to break things. --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgngBr3q-2Pzy6mG9UP0LRkxwJrKLk76gF8eo7%2Bwbo6Hew>