Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 15:45:59 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed chage to sbuf semantics. Message-ID: <8607.979224359@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:34:40 MST." <200101111434.f0BEYes28373@aslan.scsiguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As original perpetrator of the sbufs, I'd like to chime in briefly. I agree with Justin about being able to succesfully retreive an overflowed sbuf. I would even suggest that finish replaces the final characters in an overflowed sbuf with "[...]" as a generic marker that overflow happened. I also agree with Dag-Erling that the API should be entirely function based. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8607.979224359>