Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:12:13 +0200 From: Rudolf Cejka <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@tcoip.com.br> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror Site Requirements... Message-ID: <20030716131213.GA30208@fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <3F154C4A.5080807@tcoip.com.br> References: <20030712173332.GB14686@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <3F14147F.2010706@jonny.eng.br> <20030715203333.GA25714@roma.coe.ufrj.br> <20030715215327.GB23859@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0307160919440.619-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <3F154C4A.5080807@tcoip.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel C. Sobral wrote (2003/07/16): > OTOH, we'd better do a consultation to find out how many mirrors won't > be able to keep up with the standards we set upon, because if lose too > many mirrors, maybe it's better to rethink the standards. I hope the goal is not to reduce the number of mirrors. The goal would be just to have clearer core of mirrors, which are sufficiently reliable and which have everything. The others would stay, as they are, however it should be documented, what they have and what they have not. ??? -- Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030716131213.GA30208>