Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:55:52 +0200
From:      Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Michael Vaile <masked@internode.on.net>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!
Message-ID:  <508944E8.3030704@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <BEB8273FF99D422281D8E9D48FE6AECC@forexamplePC>
References:  <20121016101957.GB53800@FreeBSD.org><20121022174457.GB59689@FreeBSD.org><CAJ-Vmo==UstpNtVgC2v=6wCGW%2B_Zca1CTKaL9tw=7KYhtr=nGA@mail.gmail.com><B55E1555AF4E41B196B2CE41861F1335@forexamplePC> <CAJ-Vmoms6ZcZsLHb_Vk40W0mk2mXamJj5vc14pkGMvH%2BgDh-zA@mail.gmail.com> <BEB8273FF99D422281D8E9D48FE6AECC@forexamplePC>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 25.10.2012 00:01, schrieb Michael Vale:
> Another idea, how about reducing the size of libc, porting bionic back
> to freebsd and/or porting musl libc (http://www.musl-libc.org) to FreeBSD?

I did not try to run any programs linked with musl under FreeBSD,
but it builds flawlessly with GCC and CLANG on my amd64 -CURRENT
system. The only change required was to teach GNU configure about
amd64 (they expected x86_64).

Making a "real" port is trivial bbut clearly a task for a junior
programmer ...

Regards, STefan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?508944E8.3030704>