Date: 09 Sep 1998 13:33:40 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Co=EFdan?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Mark Blackman <tmb@rcru.rl.ac.uk> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2048-byte sector support for DOS filesystem. Message-ID: <xzpk93dlduz.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Mark Blackman's message of "Wed, 09 Sep 1998 11:38:47 %2B0100" References: <199809091038.LAA07810@bird.te.rl.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Blackman <tmb@rcru.rl.ac.uk> writes: > Thanks for clearing that up for me. So in summary, the > od/scsi-related patches in kern-7210 are superceded by the CAM work, > but the msdosfs-related patches are still meant to be applied if you > want this 2048-byte block functionality in msdosfs. Such is my understanding. > This then would imply (questions of labour aside) that the > msdosfs-related patches are appropriate for inclusion in CURRENT at > some convenient point, no? It would seem so, yes. > I do understand that there literally hundreds of more important > things for the kernel gods to address, but I just want to add my > (possibly irrelevant) vote for increasing it's priority somewhat. I'm not a kernel god, but I'm a committer and I have an MO drive at home, and the PR is assigned to me anyway. I'm very forgetful though, so feel free to refresh my memory at regular intervals :) DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk93dlduz.fsf>