Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:03:53 +0900
From:      "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org>
To:        alex@big.endian.de
Cc:        asami@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NO_CHECKSUM for only some files
Message-ID:  <86og3umimu.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
In-Reply-To: In your message of "Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:48:49 %2B0200" <20000719134849.A51793@cichlids.cichlids.com>
References:  <20000719134849.A51793@cichlids.cichlids.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:48:49 +0200,
Alex wrote:
> Hello!
> I wonder if we could add some functionality to exclude specific files
> from the checksum-check.
> 
> But only some files.
> 
> A good example where this could be useful it the astro/xtide port:
> 
> While the source of the file should include the checksum-check (for
> trojans), the DATAFILE for the astro-stuff cannot contain trojans or
> similar.

No.  An intruder or a malicious administrator/user can put evil thing
in the file when you blindly call it `datafile'.

Any kind of files can contain Makefiles, configure scripts, etc. to
deceive the ports process.  I suppose we should hardly trust even
those `data' files,

Please think twice. ;)

-- 
                           /
                          /__  __       
                         / )  )  ) )  /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org

"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86og3umimu.wl>