Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:59:00 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Daniel Eriksson" <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_4bsd.c
Message-ID:  <200407141059.00907.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA49u4uh/sekCrtYGBMuCsGQEAAAAA@telia.com>
References:  <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAA49u4uh/sekCrtYGBMuCsGQEAAAAA@telia.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 05:36 pm, Daniel Eriksson wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >   Set TDF_NEEDRESCHED when a higher priority thread is scheduled in
> >   sched_add() rather than just doing it in sched_wakeup().  The old
> >   ithread preemption code used to set NEEDRESCHED
> > unconditionally if it
> >   didn't preempt which masked this bug in SCHED_4BSD.
>
> Does this mean it should be safe to turn preemption back on in param.h (for
> a kernel using SHED_4BSD)? Or is this not related to the hard hangs
> reported over the last week?

I haven't yet had time to sit down and look at the hard hangs.  It is probably 
still not quite safe to turn preemption back on.

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407141059.00907.jhb>