Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:07:56 -1000 From: spoggle <dcornejo@gmail.com> To: Rae Harbird <R.Harbird@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD, AODV and OLSR Message-ID: <6b8e8f4f0506131307478ec42a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42ADA26C.4020004@cs.ucl.ac.uk> References: <42ADA26C.4020004@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You might try the olsr.org <http://olsr.org> implementation, it's in the=20 ports tree under net/olsrd. I believe it is better tested (via a 50+ node mesh in Berlin) than the NRL= =20 one. It also has some extensions that are useful, especially the ability to= =20 incorporate quality metrics and interface preference in routing. The version in ports can be compiled to use libnet to provide the ability t= o=20 operate on multiple interfaces. If you try it and run into any problems, please let me know, I am a=20 committer to olsr.org <http://olsr.org> and the originator of the FreeBSD= =20 port. dave c On 6/13/05, Rae Harbird <R.Harbird@cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote: >=20 > Hi >=20 > I want to run some experiments with FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE and user-space > AODV and OLSR implementations. Currently, I'm thinking of trying: >=20 > UoB JAdhoc v0.21: >=20 > http://www.aodv.org/modules.php?op=3Dmodload&name=3DUpDownload&file=3Dind= ex&req=3Dviewdownload&cid=3D2 >=20 > and NRL OLSR: > http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/projects.php?name=3Dolsr >=20 > Does anyone have any positive / negative experiences of these > implementations with FreeBSD? >=20 >=20 > Thanks >=20 >=20 >=20 > Rae >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Rae Harbird >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6b8e8f4f0506131307478ec42a>