Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:23:33 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?Tmlrb2xhIExlxI1pxIc=?= <nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org, Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade with -o doesn't apply any make flags Message-ID: <47E3C4E5.6070104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080321145356.5ae3c43a@anthesphoria.net> References: <47E26FAD.3000609@cyberbotx.com> <20080321145356.5ae3c43a@anthesphoria.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nikola Lečić wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:07:41 -0400
> Naram Qashat <cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that with the current (non-devel) version of
>> portupgrade, when I was doing a replacement with -o specified, none
>> of the make flags from pkgtools.conf were being applied like they
>> normally are when I do a normal upgrade or an install. I haven't had
>> a chance to test portupgrade-devel or not, but has it been fixed in
>> that?
>
> With portupgrade-devel:
>
> MAKE_ARGS = {
> ...
> 'print/ghostscript-gnu' => 'A4=yes',
> }
>
> # portupgrade -f -o print/ghostscript-gnu print/ghostscript-gpl
> [Gathering depends for print/ghostscript-gnu ............................................... done]
> ** Detected a package name change: ghostscript-gpl (print/ghostscript-gpl) -> 'ghostscript-gnu' (print/ghostscript-gnu)
> - ---> Downgrading 'ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3' to 'ghostscript-gnu-7.07_17' (print/ghostscript-gnu)
> - ---> Building '/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu' with make flags: A4=yes
> ===> Cleaning for ghostscript-gnu-7.07_17
> => ghostscript-7.07.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist
> in /usr/ports/distfiles/ghostscript.
> .....
>
I've synced patches with ports-mgmt/portupgrade. Try again.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47E3C4E5.6070104>