Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 14:40:01 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9383: Fix for the urt port Message-ID: <199901082240.OAA03933@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/9383; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> To: Pedro Fernando Giffuni <pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9383: Fix for the urt port Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:44:47 -0500 (EST) I didn't know ExtraCFLAGS worked that way. On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Pedro Fernando Giffuni wrote: > ExtraCFLAGS is equivalent to using +=. > In urt CFLAGS is built from system definition, but I disagree on letting > it blank by default, in any case I noticed that the alpha port breaks due > to the -m486 flag. > > Pedro. > > On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Jan 1999 pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co wrote: > > > > > # You can put any system dependent flags here. > > > -ExtraCFLAGS = > > > -+ExtraCFLAGS = -m486 -O2 > > > ++ExtraCFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -fno-strength-reduce > > > > Nonsense. CFLAGS should be built from the system definition, and nothing > > more or less. > > > > - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - > > - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - > > > > > > > > > > - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901082240.OAA03933>