Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 31 Jan 1998 17:25:45 -0500 (EST)
From:      Brian Tao <taob@nbc.netcom.ca>
To:        Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RAID controllers - folks, check this thing out
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.3.95.980131170825.27817a-100000@tor-adm1>
In-Reply-To: <19980131155527.19192@mcs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Jan 1998, Karl Denninger wrote:
> 
> RAID 5, due to the way it stripes parity across the volumes, has a
> "sweet spot" in performance at 5 spindles.

    What "way" is that?  On a given stripe, one drive provides the
parity block, the choice of drive staggered across consecutive
stripes.  There may be an issue with small, sequential writes on a
RAID 5 set with a large number of drives, but I can't think of any
reason why five drives should be magical.
-- 
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@netcom.ca)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95.980131170825.27817a-100000>