Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 19:50:03 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: jamil@acroal.com (J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect) Cc: jasone@canonware.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OS Ports Message-ID: <199712110050.TAA01175@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971210132013.21564C-100000@acroal.com> from "J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect" at "Dec 10, 97 01:26:31 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect said: > > Wouldn't porting -stable first be a better project, after all you want a > quality product and that is what stable is. > Respectfully, it probably would not be a good idea, but it would be better to start from a recent, stable -current. It is *much* easier to get support from the developers on -current. -stable is approaching a year old now. -- John dyson@freebsd.org jdyson@nc.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712110050.TAA01175>